![]() ![]() We could even create another page for new project files for the version which the new library will be implanted. We create a tutorial teaching people how to import it at their own risk so they can use the older project files. zip up the old one and put it for download online to go with older compatible project files. Now here's a thought I had, what if we did delete the old sample pack and put in place a more necessity full sample library with much better sorting and naming. That could clear up a lot of unnecessary space. I always use vsts for my piano or guitar or violin or anything. Actually any sampled synth or instrument is really unnecessary to me. Like loops, honestly, if you like them, you can get some online but for me, I never really use loops, or instrument clips: if you want an instrument melody, you can get a real one or a vst. If we did replace the sounds with the same name, there are a lot of irrelevant samples which we really don't need. I gathered my own samples with the most secure a best licensing I could find. Honestly, I've really never used LMMS's samples because I thought it would lead me into some lawsuit. LMMS is totally in the clear (if contributors will accept a CC where a credit byline in 'About' is offered) The leagal stuff is ONLY relevant to the release, so let users keep all old sound-clips, and present a brand new pack with guanteed NO duplicate names at all! This way its up to the USER to decide what he uses. The leagal stuff is totally irrelevant for the enduser - heck, he could use a baff of lars ulrich in a 'song' NO-ONE would know / care. Instead, the new pack should be with guanteed different names! Let the individual user decide what he wnat to use in respect to sounds. ![]() We just need permission to put them in LMMS because most of those producers won't let you make a sample pack with them as is, unless we can get their specific permission. The people who I'm contacting are already giving away the sample 100% royalty free for commercial and personal uses. LMMS is totally in the clear (if contributors will accept a CC where a credit byline in 'About' is has a point, we've got to be careful about this. Instead the new pack should be with guanteed different names! Let the individual user decide what he wnat to use in respect to sounds. ![]() And it IS important!īut i also have an opignion (surprizeee:) on the 'replace all named clips'. If an error happens here, someone could file a ABSURDLY HUGE LAWSUIT !!! As i see it, only creative-common in one way or another, should be offered. That is a scarry completely unpredictable area for amateurs. * what is the LEAGAL !!!MEANING!!! of the TERM full credit !!!Īnd it is much more complicated that that! Is that your intrepetation of full credit ? There for they have "full credit" for creating the sample(s) We won't get any credit for creating the sample and they will. What it means by "full credit" is we put their name and email in the Author's list with name of the samples they created. ![]() The reason I find this pretty important is because I doubt many producers will want their samples on here without some kind of credit in LMMS.īut anyway, things are going good and I think LMMS's new sample pack is going to be great. (Most 100% royalty free samples don't let you put them in sample packs as is, unless you get their approval.) We definitely can't have people credit each artist, but we can put the credit here: Though credit is something that the producers will want when they let us use their royalty free samples. We have to be 100% sure the samples has the licencing that gives our users complete freedom without having to mention any credit on their projects. Samples on the internet, because of licensing and approval. We've been synthesizing, recording, collecting samples and being cautious on the amount of samples in the pack once we're done.Įverything has been going smooth, though there is one difficult thing we need to get past. As most of you know, Stian Jørgenrud, StakeoutPunch, Unfa and I have been working on a new sample pack to replace the current one. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |